Choosing Ethereum root hash database: To see a closer overview of Bitcoin Core’s decision

Ethereum blockchain, like Peer Network Bitcoin Core (BTC), relies on a number of databases on storing and handling data. Of these databases, Leveldb has become a popular choice for various applications. In this article, we are immersed in Bitcoin Core’s decision to use Leveldb instead of Redis or Sqlite.

Background of used data stores

Before we get into the technical aspects, we briefly outline the three main data stores used in Ethereum:

Ethereum: Why is Bitcoin Core using LevelDB instead of Redis or SQLite?

LISTDB **: Lightweight Disk Based Nosql Key Store.

* Redis (RDB): Optimized for high performance and durability in memory. It serves as a distributed cache and a message broker that can effectively handle large amounts of data.

SQLITE: ** A separate file-based relational database management system.

Why your level?

Bitcoin Core’s decision to use Leveldb is probably due to its specific requirements and compromises between various storage solutions:

* Performance : Leveldb offers a fast disk I/O, which is essential for storing and retrieving large amounts of data within a short period of time.

* Simultaneous Access : Because Bitcoin Core needs to support multiple simultaneous connections from various sources (such as mining equipment, nodes), the distributed architecture of Leveldb allows you to treat increased load more efficient.

* Data Structure Flexibility

: The Leveldb can store a wide range of data structures, including JSON, text and binary files, making it suitable for storing Ethereum-specific data.

Why not redis or sqlite?

While both Redis and Sqlite are popular choices, they may not be best suited to Bitcoin Core for the following reasons:

* High performance : Although the Leveldb is fast, I/O operations continue to result in slower database -access times than optimized redis configurations.

* Distributed Architecture : As mentioned above, the distributed nature of the Leveldb requires careful configuration and tuning to ensure optimum performance in a simultaneous environment such as Bitcoin Core.

* Data Structure Restrictions : Although SQLite supports various data structures, its limits are not sufficient for storing complex Ethereum-specific data generated by Bitcoin Core.

Why wouldn’t you move to Redis now?

Seeing later, it is likely that Bitcoin Core would have been moving to Redis now. With the improved hardware and the more robust software development tools, the increase in performance and efficiency would be even greater.

Conclusion

Choosing Bitcoin Core A LeveldB is a deliberate decision led by concrete requirements and compromises between various storage solutions. While this is probably not the most appropriate for all use cases, it has been proven that it is an effective solution to store Ethereum-specific data in a high-performance environment like Bitcoin Core.

This article aims to provide insight into the technical decisions of the choice of Bitcoin Core, highlighting the strengths and limits of each option. By understanding these factors, developers and users can better evaluate the complexity of the design and effective blockchain applications.